haha. You're right on. The parent child thing was happening in UserSpice 5 for sure. I do like your breadcrumb solution. Seems easy enough. Consider it done moving forward.
Wait... I mean that I already have it done and am happy to send along the files/adjustments needed so you can implement it. Where can I send it? Just email it maybe?
I will shoot you an email!
What are y'all thinking the breadcrumbs should look like? A scrolling list of pages according to the order they were accessed? Or a hierarchical list?
So if someone goes from HOME to ADMIN to ADMIN_GROUPS to ADMIN_GROUP?id=2 to ADMIN_GROUPS to ADMIN_GROUP?id=7
should the breadcrumb look like this:
home -> admin -> admin groups -> admin group (foo) -> admin groups -> admin group (bar)
and gradually scroll off the left?
Or should it look like this:
home -> admin -> admin groups -> admin group (bar)
What do you do if you got to "admin group (bar)" from somewhere besides "admin groups"?
What are y'all thinking the breadcrumbs should look like? A scrolling list of pages according to the order they were accessed? Or a hierarchical list?
So if someone goes from HOME to ADMIN to ADMIN_GROUPS to ADMIN_GROUP?id=2 to ADMIN_GROUPS to ADMIN_GROUP?id=7
should the breadcrumb look like this:
home -> admin -> admin groups -> admin group (foo) -> admin groups -> admin group (bar)
and gradually scroll off the left?
Or should it look like this:
home -> admin -> admin groups -> admin group (bar)
If the latter, what do you do if you got to "admin group (bar)" from somewhere besides "admin groups"? Say there's a list of groups in the admin_user script and you link from there to admin_group? Do you have to have multiple potential hierarchies? Or do you just prune a whole tree whenever you come back to the page which is the root of that tree?
I've actually already submitted a working structure and changes to Dan for this. Not sure if he's going to implement it in part or in whole, but the way I did it, I left the hierarchy to his/users discretion.
I got sidetracked with bugs, but I definitely liked your solution. It's going to happen. I should probably work with PLB on that to make sure we're using the same/similar solution in 4 and 5.
I 100{3bc1fe685386cc4c3ab89a3f76566d8931e181ad17f08aed9ad73b30bf28114d} agree. That's always been on my wishlist. Now that 4.1 is pretty stable, I'll probably do that.