05-10-2016, 02:19 AM
Hello all,
As ever, your here/now and future development plans for UserSpice are fantastic - many thanks to you and the whole team.
From a personal point of view, I'm especially keen on your 2 model approach, with the "stable" ("Standard"?) version being of particular interest to me - as stable user management and security are my key drivers - as is the simplicity of adding UserSpice to existing projects.
In regard to features;
1. Allow users to login via their usernames or email addresses - with the option of choosing which.
2. Allow users to login via their social media authentication details - facebook and twitter as a minimum.
3. Multi tenancy architecture - to allow multiple companies/users to reside in the same set of UserSpice database tables, will require companyid column or similar.
Thanks again for all your dedication
Jamie
As ever, your here/now and future development plans for UserSpice are fantastic - many thanks to you and the whole team.
From a personal point of view, I'm especially keen on your 2 model approach, with the "stable" ("Standard"?) version being of particular interest to me - as stable user management and security are my key drivers - as is the simplicity of adding UserSpice to existing projects.
In regard to features;
1. Allow users to login via their usernames or email addresses - with the option of choosing which.
2. Allow users to login via their social media authentication details - facebook and twitter as a minimum.
3. Multi tenancy architecture - to allow multiple companies/users to reside in the same set of UserSpice database tables, will require companyid column or similar.
Thanks again for all your dedication
Jamie