Gentallela.rar

I have not included and install, just copy over the old page. But before you copy, make a backup of your older web.

Have y'all ever considered moving all your source code into github (or another similar)? It would make life so much easier in terms of keeping bug fixes updated in each minor release, ease moving new features developed in an earlier release into the latest release, etc.

For example, I am ready to move forward on nested groups. But should I do it on 4.4 or 5.0? The easy answer is 5.0,but I don't want to wait for 5.0 release. So I develop it in stable 4.4 but how will it get into 5.0 without a horrendous, manual process of editing the changes into the new code 1 by 1.

Another example. I messed around with db.php and then wanted to upgrade to the next release. If it was in github it would simply be a question of checking out the next version and letting it handle the merging of changes. If there are conflicts then it tells you and you have to do the laborious manual editing, but with access to some tools that help...

Thoughts? Or maybe y'all already have it in some other source code mgmt system...?

Did a new install everything checked out. No errors. Upon first launch of index.php I get an 500 error. Did some searching and found a recommendation to change the .htaccess to .htbak I did that but no change.

Any help would be appreciated.

John

Just updated to 4.1.5 the other day and testing everything out. From the login page if you click forgot password under help dropdown and then put in a valid email that is in the database , this is the message I get.

2016-09-28 17:19:12 Invalid address: (addAnAddress to): quest{3bc1fe685386cc4c3ab89a3f76566d8931e181ad17f08aed9ad73b30bf28114d}40hsrc.unc.edu

the first part of the email, (quest) is made up, everything after is valid and should be @hsrc.unc.edu
Double checked that the email is set for one of my users. Any help would be appreciated

Hi,

Sorry, still using Version 4.1.3. After adding and deleting several users, I noticed that editing the bio in edit_profile.php had no effect, i.e. nothing has been written to the data base.
Thus, I found that in the data base in the profiles tab, the id and the user_id can differ.
So I think that in edit_profile.php the data base update has to use the id and not the user_id.
A change of

Hi,
putting customized files into usersc is great. I'm not sure if it is documented, but the path to the init.php has to be adapted for files in usersc, of course (this was repeatedly in the forums). It is clear that also other paths must be adapted, like

Hello,

I have tried both 4.1.5 and the newest 4.2 Alpha, both seem to allow me to test the email settings and have it work properly but once you attempt to alter your email (verify) or forgot your password the emails do not work and consitently report "Please contact administrator". I have set the debug to 3 and it only outputs something on the email_test.php and not verify_resend/forgot_password pages.

Any help appreciated!

When I first found US it was because I was looking for a plug-in for CakePHP which would automatically implement the users/groups side of things so I could get on with developing my CakePHP project rather than re-developing that basic functionality each time.

Obviously I found US so there is some connection with Cake ... but I don't see a lot of discussion of that. Is US for Cake just historical and based on old versions which are largely fade-to-gray at this point? Or does US integrate into CakePHP in its current implementation?

Hey Userspice developers,

I just released my project to test and I'm really happy with all the help from userspice. For future versions of userspice, I would like to point out a potential feature that I noticed when I implemented userspice to my project.

Right now userspice controls user's access to the page level, meaning that based on the user's permission level, he/she can either enter a page or not, and there is no third option. But sometimes it would be cool to allow a certain group of user to access the page, and not granting them the permission to do any editing. On the admin's side, when the admin assigns a page to a user group, the admin would be able to do a "edit/read_only" selection for that group.

To generalize this idea, the selection under each page does not necessarily need to be limited to "edit/read_only". Maybe it would be possible to list the features on each page as a multiple-selection dropdown box, so that the admin can specify the user's permission to function level.

One way that I can think of to do this would be to create a separate table in the database called "page_function_matches" for the developers to fill out the functions they have on each of their pages, and then in userspice, the admission_permission.php page reads through the table to list all functions under each page, so that the admin user can choose functions they want to be available for each user group. In the developer's pages side, the developers would add a user group info detection logic at the beginning of their page.php file. If the usergroup info comes with the desired function id, then the page would enable that particular function.

That's just one way to do it that I'm currently using for my project. I'm not a computer science person so I don't know if this is a good method or not. I'm sure you guys would have a much better idea to do this. Please let me know of any questions.

Thanks
Angel

I can login and use my site just fine under the admin user, however if I add an additional user and try to login under that account I get the error of "ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS" in chrome and any other browser. What might I be doing wrong here? I am on version 4.1.5